“A platform that profits from sexualized abuse deserves not regulation alone, but abandonment.”
- adaptationguide.com
If You’re Still on X, You Should Be Ashamed
Let’s stop pretending this is complicated.
If you are still actively using X—posting, engaging, “building a brand,” or telling yourself you’re just there for work—you are standing in a digital crime scene and acting like it’s a coffee shop.
What is happening on X right now is not a “content moderation challenge.”
It is not a “free speech debate.”
It is not an unfortunate side effect of innovation.
It is industrial-scale sexual abuse, powered by AI, enabled by platform design, mocked by its owner, and normalized in real time.
This is what Grok became:
A one-click tool to strip women and girls naked without consent, at scale, for sport.
“Put her in a micro bikini.”
“Put her in a thong.”
“Spread her legs.”
That’s not edgy humor.
That’s sexual violence, translated into prompts.
And let’s be crystal clear:
If someone used Photoshop to do this to a coworker, a classmate, or a stranger, we’d call the police.
If someone distributed altered images of minors like this offline, they’d go to prison.
But slap the word AI on it, call it anti-woke, and suddenly we’re supposed to debate nuance?
No.
Absolutely not.
Elon Musk Didn’t “Lose Control.” This Is the Point.
Do not insult our intelligence by calling this an accident.
Grok was marketed as:
-
“Anti-woke”
-
Loosely restricted
-
Sexually explicit
-
Integrated directly into harassment threads
That combination is not a bug.
It is a business model.
When users created nude deepfakes of Taylor Swift, that was the warning shot.
When Grok generated sexualized images of minors, that was the line crossed.
When Musk laughed—laughed—with crying emojis, that was the mask fully off.
This isn’t about free speech.
This is about power without consequence.
Musk didn’t just fail to stop abuse.
He signaled that it was funny, then blamed users when governments started circling.
That’s not leadership.
That’s a tech bro version of “I didn’t mean for the fire to spread.”
You built the flamethrower.
You handed it to the crowd.
You sold tickets.
Being a Woman Online Is Becoming a Punishable Act
Let’s say the quiet part out loud:
Posting a photo as a woman is now a risk calculation.
Not because of taste.
Not because of modesty.
But because any image can be turned into a fake nude, publicly, instantly, by strangers who hate you.
Politician? Actor? Journalist? Activist? Teenager?
Doesn’t matter.
Disagree with the wrong man?
Congratulations—you might be digitally undressed, bruised, bloodied, or sexualized for the algorithm’s amusement.
And yes—children were targeted.
If you are still pretending this is about adult content preferences, you are either lying or willfully blind.
This is about silencing women, exactly as Suzie Dunn warned.
This is about dragging women out of public life by making visibility unsafe.
And let’s talk about the U.S., because the pattern is unmistakable.
After:
-
MeToo
-
Epstein
-
Decades of rollback on reproductive rights
-
The normalization of misogynistic online harassment
-
And now AI-powered sexual abuse
Being a woman in America is starting to feel less like citizenship and more like conditional permission.
History has a word for systems where women are publicly owned, punished, and controlled.
It’s not progress.
“Unbiased” Doesn’t Mean Neutral Between Abuse and Decency
Here’s the unbiased truth:
There is no moral ambiguity here.
-
Non-consensual sexualized images are violence.
-
Deepfake abuse is harassment.
-
Platforms that enable it are complicit.
-
Laughing about it is endorsement.
Full stop.
If your instinct is to say “but what about—”
Stop.
That reflex exists to protect systems, not people.
No amount of irony, memes, or “free speech absolutism” justifies turning real human beings into porn against their will.
Governments Are Late. Again. Women Pay the Price. Again.
Canada.
The U.S.
Europe.
Everyone is “investigating,” “considering amendments,” “reviewing frameworks.”
Meanwhile, Grok was generating thousands of sexualized images per hour.
Every other industry has mandatory safety standards:
-
Cars
-
Food
-
Drugs
-
Aviation
But tech?
Apparently gets to experiment on women and children first, apologize later.
Australia and the U.K. proved regulation is possible.
Age verification.
Platform liability.
Mandatory safeguards.
What’s missing isn’t solutions.
It’s political will.
If You Want an Immediate Moral Response, Here It Is
Boycott Musk products. Globally.
Not next year.
Not after another report.
Now.
That means:
-
Stop using X.
-
Stop normalizing it as a “necessary platform.”
-
Stop giving cultural oxygen to companies that profit from abuse.
-
Stop pretending your individual presence doesn’t matter.
It does.
Platforms only exist because people show up.
And if your excuse is “but my job—”, understand this:
Women’s jobs now come with the risk of sexualized AI harassment simply for being visible.
That should outrage you more than losing reach or engagement.
This Is a Master Lesson—for the World
If there is one thing the rest of the world should learn from this disaster, it’s this:
Technology without ethics doesn’t liberate. It re-enslaves.
What we’re watching is not the future—it’s the past, rebranded:
-
Women as objects
-
Power as entitlement
-
Abuse as entertainment
-
Accountability as “woke censorship”
And the cost is not theoretical.
It’s paid in fear, silence, humiliation, and withdrawal from public life.
If this doesn’t make you angry, you’re not paying attention.
And if you’re still scrolling X like nothing happened?
History will remember who shrugged—and who walked away.
